Pros & Cons for routine population screening, newborn testing, etc.

Since HH is so easily treated & the outcome is best with an early diagnosis, why are we still not doing routine testing for it?  Routine screening, beginning with all newborns, along with implementation of preventative measures, are desperately needed for this condition!  Insurance companies would surely find it more cost-effective to include an iron profile in their screening programs & treat iron overload in the early stages as opposed to a later diagnosis. 
[It is obvious that I am totally FOR routine screening for HH, but you will also find links here that represent the argument against it, so that you may form your own opinion.]

Click on the title to read more on this topic.

Click on this link to read about HH. Discussion of a liver biopsy is also here: 

Back to the "Munnsters" main Hemochromatosis page